Rackets › Compare

adidas Metalbone Ctrl 2026 vs Stiga ACE 3

Add a racket

The verdict

Choose the ACE 3 if you want more comfort. The Metalbone Ctrl 2026 does nothing clearly better on paper.

Metalbone Ctrl 2026Highest score
No clear edge

On paper it does nothing clearly better than the other.

ACE 3
Pick this one for
  • Comfort+1.0

Neither is sold to Netherlands by the shops on padell.io.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Metalbone Ctrl 2026 to the ACE 3: more comfort.

Controla bit less control9.08.5
Powera bit more power4.04.5
Comfortmore comfort5.06.0
Handlingabout the same6.06.0
Forgivenessa bit more forgiveness7.07.5

Metalbone Ctrl 2026ACE 3Line = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
2026
Not published
Weight
345 to 360 g
360 g
Face
Carbon Aluminized 16K
21K Alu Carbon Twill
Core
EVA Soft Performance
Hypersoft Foam
Thickness
38 mm
Not published
Head size
485 cm²
Not published
Surface
Spin Blade Decal
Sandy
Handle
Extra Power Grip
Fibreglass-reinforced handle
Frame
Octagonal Structure
Carbon
Show all specs (2 the same)
Shape
Round
Round
Balance
Even according to the brand
Even according to the brand

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Metalbone Ctrl 2026: 1. Of the ACE 3: 0.

Often mentioned in video reviews

Metalbone Ctrl 20266 videos
  • Large sweet spot 5×
  • Adjustable weight system 3×
  • Good control 3×
  • Good in defence 2×
  • Lacks power 4×
  • Less control 3×
ACE 3

No summarised videos yet.

Metalbone Ctrl 2026: reviews and videos →ACE 3: reviews and videos →

Or a third racket in between

HeadRadical Motion 2026

Better where both are weak: power 6 against 4 and 4.5, and otherwise close to the two.

€ 122.88Compare all three →

Was this page useful?