Drop Shot Conqueror Attack 1.0 vs Nox AT10 Genius 18K Alum 2026

The verdict

Choose the Conqueror Attack 1.0 if you want more handling. The AT10 Genius 18K Alum 2026 does nothing clearly better on paper.

Conqueror Attack 1.0Highest score
Pick this one for
  • Handling+1.0
AT10 Genius 18K Alum 2026
No clear edge

On paper it does nothing clearly better than the other.

Neither is sold to Netherlands by the shops on padell.io.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Conqueror Attack 1.0 to the AT10 Genius 18K Alum 2026: less handling.

Controlabout the same7.07.0
Powera bit more power8.08.5
Comforta bit less comfort2.52.0
Handlingless handling5.54.5
Forgivenessabout the same5.05.0

Conqueror Attack 1.0AT10 Genius 18K Alum 2026Line = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
2025
2026
Weight
350 to 370 g
360 to 375 g
Face
Carbon 24k
Carbon 18k
Core
Eva Pro High Density
Black Eva
Thickness
Not published
38 mm
Surface
Flat
Dual Spin
Handle
Cork Cushion Grip
Oversize grip
Frame
Double tubular carbon
Carbon
Show all specs (2 the same)
Shape
Teardrop
Teardrop
Balance
Even according to the brand
Even according to the brand

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Conqueror Attack 1.0: 0. Of the AT10 Genius 18K Alum 2026: 0.

Or a third racket in between

SiuxPegasus Revolution Cube

Better where both are weak: comfort 3.5 against 2.5 and 2, and otherwise close to the two.