Head Coello Motion 2026 vs Head Coello Motion 2025

The verdict

Choose the Coello Motion 2026 if you want more power, the Coello Motion 2025 if you want more forgiveness.

From the Coello Motion 2025 to the Coello Motion 2026 5 specs changed: balance slightly head-heavy became head-heavy; face Hybrid carbon became Carbon; core Control Foam became Power Foam; surface 3D rough finish became rough; frame Carbon became CarbonHybrid.

Coello Motion 2026Highest score
Pick this one for
  • Power+1.0
Coello Motion 2025
Pick this one for
  • Forgiveness+1.0

Better buy now: the Coello Motion 2026. It plays at least as well on paper and costs € 13.35 less in Netherlands.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Coello Motion 2026 to the Coello Motion 2025: less power, more forgiveness.

Controla bit less control6.05.5
Powerless power8.07.0
Comforta bit more comfort6.57.0
Handlingabout the same5.05.0
Forgivenessmore forgiveness3.04.0

Coello Motion 2026Coello Motion 2025Line = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
2026
2025
Balance
Head-heavy according to the brand, 268 mm
Slightly head-heavy according to the brand, 268 mm
Face
Carbon
Hybrid carbon
Core
Power Foam
Control Foam
Thickness
38 mm
Not published
Head size
Not published
475 cm²
Surface
Rough
3D rough finish
Frame
CarbonHybrid
Carbon
Show all specs (2 the same)
Shape
Diamond
Diamond
Weight
360 g
360 g

Not published for one of the two, so not compared: thickness and head size.

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Coello Motion 2026: 1. Of the Coello Motion 2025: 0.

Often mentioned in video reviews

Coello Motion 20266 videos
  • Easy to handle 5×
  • Lots of power 4×
  • Good in defence 3×
  • Good feel 2×
  • Less control 2×
  • Harder in defence 2×
  • Lacks power 2×
Coello Motion 2025

No summarised videos yet.

Or a third racket in between

HeadSpeed One 2025

Better where both are weak: forgiveness 5 against 3 and 4, and otherwise close to the two.

Was this page useful?