Rackets › Compare

Siux Trilogy Pro 5 2025 vs Siux Trilogy Pro 2026

Add a racket

The verdict

Choose the Trilogy Pro 5 2025 if you want more comfort. The Trilogy Pro 2026 does nothing clearly better on paper.

From the Trilogy Pro 5 2025 to the Trilogy Pro 2026 6 specs changed: weight 360 to 375 g became 355 to 375 g; face Carbon became 24K carbon (medium-stiff carbon became stiff carbon); surface 3D glossy became 3D relief; frame Carbon became Bitube Carbon Frame; handle Dual Pro Grip became Switch Strap system; level advanced became professional.

Trilogy Pro 5 2025Highest score
Pick this one for
  • Comfort+1.0
Trilogy Pro 2026
No clear edge

On paper it does nothing clearly better than the other.

Better buy now: the Trilogy Pro 5 2025. It plays at least as well on paper and costs € 20.00 less in Netherlands.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Trilogy Pro 5 2025 to the Trilogy Pro 2026: less comfort.

Controlabout the same9.59.5
Powera bit more power4.04.5
Comfortless comfort5.54.5
Handlingabout the same6.56.5
Forgivenessabout the same7.07.0

Trilogy Pro 5 2025Trilogy Pro 2026Line = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
2025
2026
Weight
360 to 375 g
355 to 375 g
Face
Carbon
24K carbon
Thickness
Not published
38 mm
Surface
3D glossy
3D relief
Handle
Dual Pro Grip
Switch Strap system
Frame
Carbon
Bitube Carbon Frame
Show all specs (3 the same)
Shape
Round
Round
Balance
Head-light according to the brand
Head-light according to the brand
Core
EVA rubber
EVA rubber

Not published for one of the two, so not compared: thickness and pro player.

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Trilogy Pro 5 2025: 0. Of the Trilogy Pro 2026: 0.

Trilogy Pro 5 2025: reviews and videos →Trilogy Pro 2026: reviews and videos →

Or a third racket in between

adidasMetalbone Ctrl 2026

Sits between the two on paper: more comfort than the Trilogy Pro 2026.

€ 224.95Compare all three →

Was this page useful?