Rackets › Compare

Bullpadel Xplo 02 Comfort vs Stiga 1.3K Hard Cybershape

Add a racket

The verdict

Choose the Xplo 02 Comfort if you want more comfort, control and handling, the 1.3K Hard Cybershape if you want more power.

Xplo 02 ComfortHighest score
Pick this one for
  • Comfort+2.5
  • Control+1.5
  • Handling+1.0
1.3K Hard Cybershape
Pick this one for
  • Power+2.5

Better buy now: the 1.3K Hard Cybershape. It plays at least as well on paper and costs € 69.95 less in Netherlands.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Xplo 02 Comfort to the 1.3K Hard Cybershape: more power, less comfort, less control, less handling.

Controlless control6.04.5
Powermore power5.58.0
Comfortless comfort6.54.0
Handlingless handling4.53.5
Forgivenessa bit less forgiveness5.04.5

Xplo 02 Comfort1.3K Hard CybershapeLine = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
2027
Not published
Weight
360 to 370 g
360 g
Balance
Head-heavy according to the brand, 270 mm
Slightly head-heavy according to the brand
Face
Fibrix
1.3K Carbon Fusion
Core
MultiEVA
Performance Foam
Thickness
38 mm
Not published
Head size
535 cm²
Not published
Surface
3D
Sandy
Handle
Not published
Detachable wrist strap
Frame
Not published
360 Carbon Frame
Show all specs (1 the same)
Shape
Hybrid
Hybrid

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Xplo 02 Comfort: 0. Of the 1.3K Hard Cybershape: 0.

Xplo 02 Comfort: reviews and videos →1.3K Hard Cybershape: reviews and videos →

Or a third racket in between

OxdogUltimate Woman Air

Better where both are weak: handling 6.5 against 4.5 and 3.5, and otherwise close to the two.

€ 249.90Compare all three →

Was this page useful?