
Stiga
1.3K Hard Cybershape
6.7padell.io scoreSpecs only- Shape
- Teardrop
- Weight
- 360 g
- Balance
- Slightly head-heavy
- Core
- Performance Foam
The short answer
A power racket: strong on smashes and volleys. Slower to swing and to react with.
Worked out from the published specs. No editorial review yet.Strong at
- Strong on smashes and volleys
Less strong at
- Slower to swing
- Firm, can be tough on the arm
- Harder to place precisely
How it plays
6.7
padell.io score 6.7Play 6.6 (60%) and reviews 6.8 (40%). No independent reviews found yet, so that part starts low. How we score
Control4.5below average
Power8.0above average
Comfort4.0below average
Handling3.5below average
Forgiveness4.5below average
Line = the average of all rackets
Specifications
ShapeCybershapeBetween control and power
Weight360 gAverage: not tiring, stable enough
BalanceSlightly head-heavyHead-heavy: more power overhead, slower to move
Face1.3K Carbon Fusion
CorePerformance FoamHard: control and power at speed, more vibration
SurfaceSandyRough: helps with spin
HandleDetachable wrist strap
Frame360 Carbon Frame
Not published by the brand: thickness, head size
Specs from the brand's own site · checked 24 September 2026 · Spotted a wrong spec? Tell us →
Every version
Compare all versions →We start tracking the price as soon as a shop in your market sells it.
Similar rackets
Questions before you buy
What is the closest alternative?
The Siux Fenix Go 4 plays most alike. Differences: power +1.0, comfort -1.0. Today: € 64.95.
Compare side by side →Who should not buy it?
Skip it if you rely on placement and long rallies (control 4.5/10), or if your elbow or shoulder complains (comfort 4.0/10), or if you are still learning: it is not very forgiving (4.5/10).
How heavy is it really?
The brand gives 360 g. That counts as medium on our scale. Each racket can differ within that range.
Why a range? →




