Stiga 1.3K Hard Cybershape
Stiga

1.3K Hard Cybershape

6.7padell.io scoreSpecs only
Shape
Teardrop
Weight
360 g
Balance
Slightly head-heavy
Core
Performance Foam
Does it suit your game?Seven quick questions, with this racket as the starting point.
Question 1 of 7

What is your level?

The short answer

A power racket: strong on smashes and volleys. Slower to swing and to react with.

Worked out from the published specs. No editorial review yet.

Strong at

  • Strong on smashes and volleys

Less strong at

  • Slower to swing
  • Firm, can be tough on the arm
  • Harder to place precisely

How it plays

6.7
padell.io score 6.7Play 6.6 (60%) and reviews 6.8 (40%). No independent reviews found yet, so that part starts low. How we score
Control4.5below average
Power8.0above average
Comfort4.0below average
Handling3.5below average
Forgiveness4.5below average

Line = the average of all rackets

Specifications

ShapeCybershapeBetween control and power
Weight360 gAverage: not tiring, stable enough
BalanceSlightly head-heavyHead-heavy: more power overhead, slower to move
Face1.3K Carbon Fusion
CorePerformance FoamHard: control and power at speed, more vibration
SurfaceSandyRough: helps with spin
HandleDetachable wrist strap
Frame360 Carbon Frame

Not published by the brand: thickness, head size

Specs from the brand's own site · checked 24 September 2026 · Spotted a wrong spec? Tell us →

We start tracking the price as soon as a shop in your market sells it.

Similar rackets

Questions before you buy

What is the closest alternative?

The Siux Fenix Go 4 plays most alike. Differences: power +1.0, comfort -1.0. Today: € 64.95.

Compare side by side →
Who should not buy it?

Skip it if you rely on placement and long rallies (control 4.5/10), or if your elbow or shoulder complains (comfort 4.0/10), or if you are still learning: it is not very forgiving (4.5/10).

How heavy is it really?

The brand gives 360 g. That counts as medium on our scale. Each racket can differ within that range.

Why a range? →