Head Radical Pro 2026 vs Head Radical Motion 2026

The verdict

Choose the Radical Pro 2026 if you want more power, the Radical Motion 2026 if you want more handling.

Radical Pro 2026Highest score
Pick this one for
  • Power+1.0
Radical Motion 2026
Pick this one for
  • Handling+1.0

Better buy now: the Radical Motion 2026. It plays at least as well on paper and costs € 29.51 less in Netherlands.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Radical Pro 2026 to the Radical Motion 2026: less power, more handling.

Controlabout the same8.08.0
Powerless power7.06.0
Comforta bit more comfort6.06.5
Handlingmore handling4.55.5
Forgivenessabout the same6.56.5

Radical Pro 2026Radical Motion 2026Line = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Weight
370 g
355 g
Core
Foam
Control Foam
Handle
Not published
Soft Butt Cap+
Frame
Frame designed without traditional tubular
Fiberglass on the faces
Show all specs (6 the same)
Launched
2026
2026
Shape
Teardrop
Teardrop
Balance
Head-light according to the brand, 260 mm
Head-light according to the brand, 260 mm
Face
Carbon
Carbon
Thickness
38 mm
38 mm
Surface
Flat
Flat

Reviews and videos

padel.how

Rates both about the same: 7.6 and 7.7.

Radical Pro 20267.6Best for: Advanced players with early preparation and control-first point-building styleRead the review
Radical Motion 20267.7Best for: Advanced technical players prioritizing speed and defensive controlRead the review

Often mentioned in video reviews

Said about both: good control, lacks power.

Radical Pro 20265 videos
  • Good control 3×
  • Good feel 2×
  • Harder to handle 2×
  • Lacks power 2×
  • Feels heavy 2×
Radical Motion 20264 videos
  • Good control 4×
  • Easy to handle 3×
  • Comfortable, little vibration 2×
  • Lacks power 2×
  • Little spin 2×

Or a third racket in between

TecnifibreCurva Speed 2026

Sits between the two on paper: more handling than the Radical Pro 2026, more power than the Radical Motion 2026.

Was this page useful?