Nox AT10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustín Tapia 2025 vs Drop Shot Conqueror Attack 1.0

The verdict

Choose the Conqueror Attack 1.0 if you want more handling. The AT10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustín Tapia 2025 does nothing clearly better on paper.

AT10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustín Tapia 2025
No clear edge

On paper it does nothing clearly better than the other.

Conqueror Attack 1.0Highest score
Pick this one for
  • Handling+1.0

Neither is sold to Netherlands by the shops on padell.io.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the AT10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustín Tapia 2025 to the Conqueror Attack 1.0: more handling.

Controlabout the same7.07.0
Powera bit less power8.58.0
Comforta bit more comfort2.02.5
Handlingmore handling4.55.5
Forgivenessabout the same5.05.0

AT10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustín Tapia 2025Conqueror Attack 1.0Line = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Weight
360 to 375 g
350 to 370 g
Face
Carbon Alum 18k
Carbon 24k
Core
Multilayer MLD Black EVA
Eva Pro High Density
Thickness
38 mm
Not published
Surface
Spin 3D pattern surface and rough sand finish
Flat
Handle
Custom grip
Cork Cushion Grip
Frame
Carbon Frame
Double tubular carbon
Show all specs (3 the same)
Launched
2025
2025
Shape
Teardrop
Teardrop
Balance
Even according to the brand
Even according to the brand

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the AT10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustín Tapia 2025: 0. Of the Conqueror Attack 1.0: 0.

Or a third racket in between

SiuxPegasus Revolution Cube

Better where both are weak: comfort 3.5 against 2 and 2.5, and otherwise close to the two.