Nox Genius 12K Alum XTREM Lite vs Drop Shot Conqueror Attack 1.0

The verdict

Choose the Conqueror Attack 1.0 if you want more handling. The Genius 12K Alum XTREM Lite does nothing clearly better on paper.

Genius 12K Alum XTREM Lite
No clear edge

On paper it does nothing clearly better than the other.

Conqueror Attack 1.0
Pick this one for
  • Handling+1.0

Neither is sold to Netherlands by the shops on padell.io.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Genius 12K Alum XTREM Lite to the Conqueror Attack 1.0: more handling.

Controlabout the same7.07.0
Powera bit less power8.58.0
Comforta bit more comfort2.02.5
Handlingmore handling4.55.5
Forgivenessabout the same5.05.0

Genius 12K Alum XTREM LiteConqueror Attack 1.0Line = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
2027
2025
Weight
360 to 375 g
350 to 370 g
Face
12K Alum Xtrem carbon
24K carbon
Core
HR3 White EVA
EVA Pro High Density
Thickness
38 mm
Not published
Surface
Dual Spin
Flat
Handle
Not published
Cork Cushion Grip
Frame
Carbon
Double tubular carbon
Show all specs (2 the same)
Shape
Teardrop
Teardrop
Balance
Even according to the brand
Even according to the brand

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Genius 12K Alum XTREM Lite: 0. Of the Conqueror Attack 1.0: 0.

Or a third racket in between

NoxAT10 Genius 12K

Better where both are weak: comfort 4 against 2 and 2.5, and otherwise close to the two.

Was this page useful?