Stiga 18K LW 2 Cybershape vs Vibor-A Black Mamba Pro Neo

The verdict

Choose the 18K LW 2 Cybershape if you want more comfort and handling, the Black Mamba Pro Neo if you want more power.

18K LW 2 CybershapeHighest score
Pick this one for
  • Comfort+2.0
  • Handling+1.5
Black Mamba Pro Neo
Pick this one for
  • Power+1.0

Neither is sold to Netherlands by the shops on padell.io.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the 18K LW 2 Cybershape to the Black Mamba Pro Neo: less comfort, less handling, more power.

Controlabout the same7.07.0
Powermore power5.56.5
Comfortless comfort6.54.5
Handlingless handling7.05.5
Forgivenessa bit less forgiveness5.55.0

18K LW 2 CybershapeBlack Mamba Pro NeoLine = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Shape
Cybershape
Híbrida
Weight
345 g
Not published
Balance
Even according to the brand
Not published
Face
18K Carbon Duplex
CARBONO 24K
Core
Hypersoft Foam
EVA PRO BALANCE
Thickness
Not published
38 mm
Surface
Crystal Grip
BRILLO ARENADO
Handle
Longer handle
Not published
Frame
360 Carbon Frame
CARBONO

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the 18K LW 2 Cybershape: 0. Of the Black Mamba Pro Neo: 0.

Or a third racket in between

StarVieAstrum+

Sits between the two on paper: more power than the 18K LW 2 Cybershape, more comfort than the Black Mamba Pro Neo.