Wilson Bela Pro Padel V2.5 vs Wilson Bela Pro V3 2025

The verdict

Choose the Bela Pro Padel V2.5 if you want more handling and comfort, the Bela Pro V3 2025 if you want more forgiveness, control and power.

From the Bela Pro Padel V2.5 to the Bela Pro V3 2025 7 specs changed: shape diamond became teardrop; weight 360 to 380 g became 370 g; face Carbon 3k became Carbon 24k (soft carbon became stiff carbon); core Firm EVA became Power Foam (medium-hard core became soft core); surface rough became Spin2 Texture; frame premium carbon became C2 Tubular construction; level professional became advanced / competition.

Bela Pro Padel V2.5
Pick this one for
  • Handling+1.5
  • Comfort+1.0
Bela Pro V3 2025Highest score
Pick this one for
  • Forgiveness+2.5
  • Control+1.0
  • Power+1.0

The Bela Pro V3 2025 plays better on paper (8.9 against 6.6), the Bela Pro Padel V2.5 costs € 85.05 less in Netherlands. Pick the Bela Pro Padel V2.5 if the price matters more than that difference.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Bela Pro Padel V2.5 to the Bela Pro V3 2025: more forgiveness, less handling, more control, more power, less comfort.

Controlmore control5.06.0
Powermore power7.58.5
Comfortless comfort6.05.0
Handlingless handling4.02.5
Forgivenessmore forgiveness3.56.0

Bela Pro Padel V2.5Bela Pro V3 2025Line = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
2024
2025
Shape
Diamond
Teardrop
Weight
360 to 380 g
370 g
Balance
Head-heavy according to the brand, 265 mm
Head-heavy according to the brand
Face
Carbon 3k
Carbon 24k
Core
Firm EVA
Power Foam
Thickness
38 mm
Not published
Surface
Rough
Spin2 Texture
Frame
premium carbon
C2 Tubular construction

Not published for one of the two, so not compared: balance point and thickness.

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Bela Pro Padel V2.5: 0. Of the Bela Pro V3 2025: 0.

Or a third racket in between

OxdogUltimate Woman Air

Better where both are weak: handling 6.5 against 4 and 2.5, and otherwise close to the two.