adidas Adipower Light 3.3 vs adidas Adipower Light 3.2
The verdict
Choose the Adipower Light 3.3 if you want more comfort, the Adipower Light 3.2 if you want more control and power.
From the Adipower Light 3.2 to the Adipower Light 3.3 3 specs changed: face Carbon Aluminized 24K became Alutex fiber (stiff carbon became fibreglass); core EVA Soft Energy became EVA Soft Performance; pro player Marta Ortega became Mafalda Fernandes.
- Comfort+1.5
- Control+1.5
- Power+1.0
Neither is sold to Netherlands by the shops on padell.io.
Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →
How they play
From the Adipower Light 3.3 to the Adipower Light 3.2: more control, less comfort, more power.
From the Adipower Light 3.2 to the Adipower Light 3.3: less control, more comfort, less power.
Adipower Light 3.3Adipower Light 3.2Line = the average of all rackets
Where the specs differ
Show all specs (7 the same)
Reviews and videos
No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Adipower Light 3.3: 0. Of the Adipower Light 3.2: 1.
Often mentioned in video reviews
Said about both: easy to handle, lacks power.
- Easy to handle 5×
- Large sweet spot 3×
- Good control 2×
- Good spin 2×
- Lacks power 2×
- Small sweet spot 2×
- Easy to handle 3×
- Comfortable, little vibration 2×
- Lacks power 3×
Or a third racket in between
Sits between the two on paper: more control than the Adipower Light 3.3, more comfort than the Adipower Light 3.2.
Was this page useful?











