Rackets › Compare

adidas Metalbone 3.3 vs Drop Shot Canyon Pro Attack Soft 2026

Add a racket

The verdict

Choose the Metalbone 3.3 if you want more power. The Canyon Pro Attack Soft 2026 does nothing clearly better on paper.

Metalbone 3.3Highest score
Pick this one for
  • Power+1.0
Canyon Pro Attack Soft 2026
No clear edge

On paper it does nothing clearly better than the other.

Neither is sold to Netherlands by the shops on padell.io.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Metalbone 3.3 to the Canyon Pro Attack Soft 2026: less power.

Controla bit less control4.54.0
Powerless power10.09.0
Comforta bit less comfort6.05.5
Handlingabout the same3.03.0
Forgivenessa bit less forgiveness4.54.0

Metalbone 3.3Canyon Pro Attack Soft 2026Line = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
2024
2026
Weight
345 to 360 g
350 to 370 g
Face
Carbon Aluminized 2 to 1 fiber
12K Textreme Carbon
Core
EVA Soft Performance
EVA Soft Low Density
Thickness
38 mm
Not published
Head size
485 cm²
Not published
Surface
Spin Blade Decal
Not published
Frame
Carbon
Double tubular carbon
Show all specs (2 the same)
Shape
Diamond
Diamond
Balance
Head-heavy according to the brand
Head-heavy according to the brand

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Metalbone 3.3: 1. Of the Canyon Pro Attack Soft 2026: 0.

Often mentioned in video reviews

Metalbone 3.37 videos
  • Adjustable weight system 5×
  • Good spin 3×
  • Good in defence 2×
  • Large sweet spot 2×
  • Little feel 3×
  • Demanding, needs good technique 2×
  • Lacks power 2×
  • Expensive 2×
Canyon Pro Attack Soft 2026

No summarised videos yet.

Metalbone 3.3: reviews and videos →Canyon Pro Attack Soft 2026: reviews and videos →

Or a third racket in between

StarVieTritón Balance + 2026

Sits between the two on paper: more power than the Canyon Pro Attack Soft 2026.

€ 154.95Compare all three →

Was this page useful?