adidas Metalbone Ctrl 3.3 vs Tecnifibre Wall Master 355

The verdict

Choose the Wall Master 355 if you want more comfort. The Metalbone Ctrl 3.3 does nothing clearly better on paper.

Metalbone Ctrl 3.3Highest score
No clear edge

On paper it does nothing clearly better than the other.

Wall Master 355
Pick this one for
  • Comfort+1.0

Neither is sold to Netherlands by the shops on padell.io.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Metalbone Ctrl 3.3 to the Wall Master 355: more comfort.

Controlabout the same8.58.5
Powera bit less power4.54.0
Comfortmore comfort6.07.0
Handlingabout the same6.06.0
Forgivenessabout the same7.57.5

Metalbone Ctrl 3.3Wall Master 355Line = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
2024
Not published
Weight
345 to 360 g
355 g
Balance
Even according to the brand
Even according to the brand, 265 mm
Face
Carbon Aluminized 2 to 1
Graphite
Core
EVA Soft Performance
EVA foam
Head size
485 cm²
Not published
Surface
Spin Blade Decal
Smooth
Frame
Carbon
Graphite
Show all specs (2 the same)
Shape
Round
Round
Thickness
38 mm
38 mm

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Metalbone Ctrl 3.3: 0. Of the Wall Master 355: 0.

Often mentioned in video reviews

Metalbone Ctrl 3.36 videos
  • Good control 4×
  • Adjustable weight system 3×
  • Easy to handle 2×
  • Demanding, needs good technique 3×
  • Lacks power 3×
  • Small sweet spot 3×
  • Vibration, hard on the arm 2×
Wall Master 355

No summarised videos yet.

Or a third racket in between

SiuxTrilogy Elite 6

Close to both on paper, with more control than either.

Was this page useful?