adidas Adipower Multiweight Ctrl 3.3 vs adidas Metalbone Ctrl 3.3

The verdict

Choose the Adipower Multiweight Ctrl 3.3 if you want more handling and control, the Metalbone Ctrl 3.3 if you want more comfort.

Adipower Multiweight Ctrl 3.3
Pick this one for
  • Handling+1.5
  • Control+1.0
Metalbone Ctrl 3.3
Pick this one for
  • Comfort+1.0

Neither is sold to Netherlands by the shops on padell.io.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Adipower Multiweight Ctrl 3.3 to the Metalbone Ctrl 3.3: less handling, less control, more comfort.

Controlless control9.58.5
Powera bit more power4.04.5
Comfortmore comfort5.06.0
Handlingless handling7.56.0
Forgivenessa bit more forgiveness7.07.5

Adipower Multiweight Ctrl 3.3Metalbone Ctrl 3.3Line = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Balance
Even according to the brand, 255 mm
Even according to the brand
Face
Carbon Aluminized 18K
Carbon Aluminized 2 to 1
Core
EVA High Memory
EVA Soft Performance
Head size
460 cm²
485 cm²
Frame
100% carbon
Carbon
Show all specs (5 the same)
Launched
2024
2024
Shape
Round
Round
Weight
345 to 360 g
345 to 360 g
Thickness
38 mm
38 mm
Surface
Spin Blade Decal
Spin Blade Decal

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Adipower Multiweight Ctrl 3.3: 0. Of the Metalbone Ctrl 3.3: 0.

Often mentioned in video reviews

Said about both: good control.

Adipower Multiweight Ctrl 3.32 videos
  • Good control 2×
Metalbone Ctrl 3.36 videos
  • Good control 4×
  • Adjustable weight system 3×
  • Easy to handle 2×
  • Demanding, needs good technique 3×
  • Lacks power 3×
  • Small sweet spot 3×
  • Vibration, hard on the arm 2×

Or a third racket in between

SiuxValkiria Pro 2026

Better where both are weak: power 7 against 4 and 4.5, and otherwise close to the two.

Was this page useful?