Rackets › Compare

adidas Metalbone HRD+ 3.3 vs Nox Future Attack 15K by Martín Abud

Add a racket

The verdict

Choose the Metalbone HRD+ 3.3 if you want more power, the Future Attack 15K by Martín Abud if you want more handling and control.

Metalbone HRD+ 3.3
Pick this one for
  • Power+1.5
Future Attack 15K by Martín Abud
Pick this one for
  • Handling+1.5
  • Control+1.0

Better buy now: the Metalbone HRD+ 3.3. It plays at least as well on paper and costs € 70.49 less in Netherlands.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Metalbone HRD+ 3.3 to the Future Attack 15K by Martín Abud: less power, more handling, more control.

Controlmore control4.05.0
Powerless power9.58.0
Comforta bit more comfort4.04.5
Handlingmore handling3.04.5
Forgivenessabout the same3.53.5

Metalbone HRD+ 3.3Future Attack 15K by Martín AbudLine = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
2024
Not published
Weight
345 to 360 g
355 to 365 g
Balance
Head-heavy according to the brand
Not published
Face
Carbon Aluminized 2 to 1
15K carbon
Core
EVA High Memory
EV50
Head size
485 cm²
Not published
Surface
Spin Blade Decal
Rough
Show all specs (3 the same)
Shape
Diamond
Diamond
Thickness
38 mm
38 mm
Frame
Carbon
Carbon

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Metalbone HRD+ 3.3: 0. Of the Future Attack 15K by Martín Abud: 0.

Often mentioned in video reviews

Metalbone HRD+ 3.34 videos
  • Adjustable weight system 3×
  • Lots of power 3×
  • Good spin 2×
  • Demanding, needs good technique 3×
Future Attack 15K by Martín Abud

No summarised videos yet.

Metalbone HRD+ 3.3: reviews and videos →Future Attack 15K by Martín Abud: reviews and videos →

Or a third racket in between

adidasAdipower 10th Anniversary

Sits between the two on paper: more handling than the Metalbone HRD+ 3.3, more power than the Future Attack 15K by Martín Abud.

€ 240.00Compare all three →

Was this page useful?