adidas Metalbone HRD+ 3.3 vs adidas Metalbone HRD 3.2
The verdict
On paper they play much the same, so price and feel decide.
From the Metalbone HRD 3.2 to the Metalbone HRD+ 3.3 one spec changed: face 2-1 Aluminized Carbon became Carbon Aluminized 2 to 1.
Neither is sold to Netherlands by the shops on padell.io.
Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →
How they play
From the Metalbone HRD+ 3.3 to the Metalbone HRD 3.2 you gain and lose little: every trait stays within one point.
From the Metalbone HRD 3.2 to the Metalbone HRD+ 3.3 you gain and lose little: every trait stays within one point.
Metalbone HRD+ 3.3Metalbone HRD 3.2Line = the average of all rackets
Where the specs differ
Show all specs (7 the same)
Not published for one of the two, so not compared: surface.
Reviews and videos
No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Metalbone HRD+ 3.3: 0. Of the Metalbone HRD 3.2: 1.
Often mentioned in video reviews
Said about both: adjustable weight system, lots of power, demanding, needs good technique.
- Adjustable weight system 3×
- Lots of power 3×
- Good spin 2×
- Demanding, needs good technique 3×
- Adjustable weight system 3×
- Lots of power 3×
- Harder in defence 2×
- Demanding, needs good technique 2×
Or a third racket in between
Sits between the two on paper: more power than the Metalbone HRD+ 3.3.
Was this page useful?












