Babolat Viper Soft Juan Lebrón 3.0 vs Babolat Technical Veron 3.0

The verdict

Choose the Viper Soft Juan Lebrón 3.0 if you want more power, the Technical Veron 3.0 if you want more handling, control, forgiveness and comfort.

Viper Soft Juan Lebrón 3.0
Pick this one for
  • Power+1.0
Technical Veron 3.0
Pick this one for
  • Handling+3.0
  • Control+2.0
  • Forgiveness+1.5
  • Comfort+1.0

Better buy now: the Technical Veron 3.0. It plays at least as well on paper and costs € 40.00 less in Netherlands.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Viper Soft Juan Lebrón 3.0 to the Technical Veron 3.0: more handling, more control, more forgiveness, less power, more comfort.

Controlmore control2.04.0
Powerless power10.09.0
Comfortmore comfort3.04.0
Handlingmore handling2.05.0
Forgivenessmore forgiveness2.03.5

Viper Soft Juan Lebrón 3.0Technical Veron 3.0Line = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Weight
365 g
360 g
Balance
Head-heavy according to the brand
Head-heavy according to the brand, 270 mm
Face
Soft Carbon
Carbon Flex
Surface
3D Spin
3D Finish
Handle
Syntec Pro
Not published
Show all specs (5 the same)
Launched
2026
2026
Shape
Diamond
Diamond
Core
Black EVA
Black EVA
Thickness
38 mm
38 mm
Frame
Carbon
Carbon

Reviews and videos

padel.how

Rates both about the same: 7.3 and 7.4.

Viper Soft Juan Lebrón 3.07.3Best for: Advanced attackers wanting high power with more match marginRead the review
Technical Veron 3.07.4Best for: Intermediate attackers seeking strong volleys and smashes easilyRead the review

Often mentioned in video reviews

Said about both: easy to handle, lots of power.

Viper Soft Juan Lebrón 3.04 videos
  • Easy to handle 3×
  • Lots of power 2×
  • Large sweet spot 2×
  • Demanding, needs good technique 3×
  • Expensive 2×
Technical Veron 3.03 videos
  • Easy to handle 2×
  • Lots of power 2×
  • Small sweet spot 2×

Or a third racket in between

OxdogHyper Pro 2.0 Classics

Better where both are weak: control 6.5 against 2 and 4, and otherwise close to the two.

Was this page useful?