Rackets › Compare

Babolat Technical Veron 3.0 vs Joma APPT

Add a racket

The verdict

Choose the Technical Veron 3.0 if you want more handling and control. The APPT does nothing clearly better on paper.

Technical Veron 3.0Highest score
Pick this one for
  • Handling+2.0
  • Control+1.0
APPT
No clear edge

On paper it does nothing clearly better than the other.

Neither is sold to Netherlands by the shops on padell.io.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Technical Veron 3.0 to the APPT: less handling, less control.

Controlless control4.03.0
Powera bit more power9.09.5
Comfortabout the same4.04.0
Handlingless handling5.03.0
Forgivenessa bit less forgiveness3.53.0

Technical Veron 3.0APPTLine = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
2026
Not published
Weight
360 g
355 to 360 g
Balance
Head-heavy according to the brand, 270 mm
Head-heavy according to the brand
Face
Carbon Flex
3K carbon
Thickness
38 mm
Not published
Surface
3D Finish
Not published
Show all specs (3 the same)
Shape
Diamond
Diamond
Core
Black EVA
Black EVA
Frame
Carbon
Carbon

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Technical Veron 3.0: 1. Of the APPT: 0.

Often mentioned in video reviews

Technical Veron 3.03 videos
  • Easy to handle 2×
  • Lots of power 2×
  • Small sweet spot 2×
APPT

No summarised videos yet.

Technical Veron 3.0: reviews and videos →APPT: reviews and videos →

Or a third racket in between

OxdogHyper Pro 2.0 Classics

Better where both are weak: control 6.5 against 4 and 3, and otherwise close to the two.

€ 299.90Compare all three →

Was this page useful?