Drop Shot Axion Attack 2.0 vs Drop Shot Conqueror Attack 2.0

The verdict

Choose the Axion Attack 2.0 if you want more handling and control, the Conqueror Attack 2.0 if you want more power.

Axion Attack 2.0Highest score
Pick this one for
  • Handling+2.0
  • Control+1.5
Conqueror Attack 2.0
Pick this one for
  • Power+1.5

Better buy now: the Conqueror Attack 2.0. It plays at least as well on paper and costs € 10.05 less in Netherlands.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Axion Attack 2.0 to the Conqueror Attack 2.0: less handling, less control, more power.

Controlless control7.05.5
Powermore power8.09.5
Comforta bit less comfort2.52.0
Handlingless handling5.53.5
Forgivenessabout the same5.05.0

Axion Attack 2.0Conqueror Attack 2.0Line = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Balance
Slightly head-heavy according to the brand, 268 mm
Slightly head-heavy according to the brand, 285 mm
Thickness
Not published
38 mm
Surface
Not published
Rough
Show all specs (6 the same)
Launched
2026
2026
Shape
Teardrop
Teardrop
Weight
350 to 370 g
350 to 370 g
Face
24K Twill Textreme Carbon
24K Twill Textreme Carbon
Core
EVA Pro High Density
EVA Pro High Density
Frame
Double tubular carbon
Double tubular carbon

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Axion Attack 2.0: 0. Of the Conqueror Attack 2.0: 0.

Often mentioned in video reviews

Axion Attack 2.05 videos
  • Lots of power 5×
  • Comfortable, little vibration 2×
  • Good spin 2×
  • Less control 2×
  • Harder to handle 2×
  • Small sweet spot 2×
Conqueror Attack 2.0

No summarised videos yet.

Or a third racket in between

NoxAT10 Genius 12K

Better where both are weak: comfort 4 against 2.5 and 2, and otherwise close to the two.

Was this page useful?