Rackets › Compare

Drop Shot Axion Attack 2.0 vs Drop Shot Axion Attack 1.0

Add a racket

The verdict

Choose the Axion Attack 2.0 if you want more handling. The Axion Attack 1.0 does nothing clearly better on paper.

From the Axion Attack 1.0 to the Axion Attack 2.0 4 specs changed: weight 360 to 370 g became 350 to 370 g; balance even became slightly head-heavy; face Carbon 24k became 24K Twill Textreme Carbon; level advanced / competition became Pro.

Axion Attack 2.0Highest score
Pick this one for
  • Handling+1.0
Axion Attack 1.0
No clear edge

On paper it does nothing clearly better than the other.

Better buy now: the Axion Attack 1.0. It plays at least as well on paper and costs € 30.00 less in Netherlands.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Axion Attack 2.0 to the Axion Attack 1.0: less handling.

Controlabout the same7.07.0
Powera bit more power8.08.5
Comforta bit less comfort2.52.0
Handlingless handling5.54.5
Forgivenessabout the same5.05.0

Axion Attack 2.0Axion Attack 1.0Line = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
2026
2025
Weight
350 to 370 g
360 to 370 g
Balance
Slightly head-heavy according to the brand, 268 mm
Even according to the brand
Face
24K Twill Textreme Carbon
Carbon 24k
Surface
Not published
Flat
Frame
Doble Tubular Carbono
Not published
Show all specs (2 the same)
Shape
Teardrop
Teardrop
Core
Eva Pro High Density
Eva Pro High Density

Not published for one of the two, so not compared: balance point, surface and frame.

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Axion Attack 2.0: 0. Of the Axion Attack 1.0: 0.

Axion Attack 2.0: reviews and videos →Axion Attack 1.0: reviews and videos →

Or a third racket in between

SiuxPegasus Revolution Cube

Better where both are weak: comfort 3.5 against 2.5 and 2, and otherwise close to the two.

€ 99.95Compare all three →