Drop Shot Conqueror Attack 2.0 vs Drop Shot Explorer 9.0

The verdict

Choose the Explorer 9.0 if you want more comfort. The Conqueror Attack 2.0 does nothing clearly better on paper.

Conqueror Attack 2.0Highest score
No clear edge

On paper it does nothing clearly better than the other.

Explorer 9.0
Pick this one for
  • Comfort+1.0

Better buy now: the Explorer 9.0. It plays at least as well on paper and costs € 25.00 less in Netherlands.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Conqueror Attack 2.0 to the Explorer 9.0: more comfort.

Controlabout the same5.55.5
Powera bit less power9.59.0
Comfortmore comfort2.03.0
Handlingabout the same3.53.5
Forgivenessabout the same5.05.0

Conqueror Attack 2.0Explorer 9.0Line = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Balance
Slightly head-heavy according to the brand, 285 mm
Slightly head-heavy according to the brand
Face
24K Twill Textreme Carbon
Raw Unidirectional Carbon
Thickness
38 mm
Not published
Surface
Rough
3D Face
Show all specs (5 the same)
Launched
2026
2026
Shape
Teardrop
Teardrop
Weight
350 to 370 g
350 to 370 g
Core
EVA Pro High Density
EVA Pro High Density
Frame
Double tubular carbon
Double tubular carbon

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Conqueror Attack 2.0: 0. Of the Explorer 9.0: 0.

Or a third racket in between

NoxAT10 Genius 12K

Better where both are weak: comfort 4 against 2 and 3, and otherwise close to the two.

Was this page useful?