Rackets › Compare

Dunlop Nanomax Pro vs Stiga 18K X Hard Cybershape

Add a racket

The verdict

Choose the Nanomax Pro if you want more power, the 18K X Hard Cybershape if you want more comfort and handling.

Nanomax Pro
Pick this one for
  • Power+1.0
18K X Hard CybershapeHighest score
Pick this one for
  • Comfort+2.0
  • Handling+1.0

The 18K X Hard Cybershape plays better on paper (8.0 against 7.5), the Nanomax Pro costs € 245.01 less in Netherlands. Pick the Nanomax Pro if the price matters more than that difference.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Nanomax Pro to the 18K X Hard Cybershape: more comfort, less power, more handling.

Controlabout the same7.07.0
Powerless power6.55.5
Comfortmore comfort5.07.0
Handlingmore handling4.55.5
Forgivenessa bit more forgiveness5.05.5

Nanomax Pro18K X Hard CybershapeLine = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
2025
Not published
Shape
Hybrid
Cybershape
Weight
370 g
360 g
Balance
Even according to the brand, 265 mm
Even according to the brand
Face
Glaphite
Carbon
Core
Eva Pro
Power Foam
Thickness
38 mm
Not published
Handle
Not published
Crystal Grip
Frame
Not published
360 Carbon
Show all specs (1 the same)
Surface
Rough
Rough

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Nanomax Pro: 0. Of the 18K X Hard Cybershape: 0.

Nanomax Pro: reviews and videos →18K X Hard Cybershape: reviews and videos →

Or a third racket in between

StarVieAstrum+

Sits between the two on paper: more handling than the Nanomax Pro, more power than the 18K X Hard Cybershape.

€ 251.95Compare all three →