Rackets › Compare

Joma Hyper Pro SFT vs Siux Fenix Pro 2026

Add a racket

The verdict

Choose the Hyper Pro SFT if you want more comfort, control, handling and forgiveness. The Fenix Pro 2026 does nothing clearly better on paper.

Hyper Pro SFT
Pick this one for
  • Comfort+2.0
  • Control+1.0
  • Handling+1.0
  • Forgiveness+1.0
Fenix Pro 2026Highest score
No clear edge

On paper it does nothing clearly better than the other.

The Fenix Pro 2026 plays better on paper (8.6 against 8.0), the Hyper Pro SFT costs € 28.95 less in Netherlands. Pick the Hyper Pro SFT if the price matters more than that difference.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Hyper Pro SFT to the Fenix Pro 2026: less comfort, less control, less handling, less forgiveness.

Controlless control3.52.5
Powerabout the same10.010.0
Comfortless comfort3.01.0
Handlingless handling3.02.0
Forgivenessless forgiveness3.02.0

Hyper Pro SFTFenix Pro 2026Line = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Weight
350 to 360 g
355 to 375 g
Core
Black EVA
High-density EVA rubber
Thickness
Not published
38 mm
Surface
Joma 3D Spin relief finish
Rough
Frame
Not published
Carbon
Show all specs (4 the same)
Launched
2026
2026
Shape
Diamond
Diamond
Balance
Head-heavy according to the brand
Head-heavy according to the brand
Face
12K carbon
12K carbon

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Hyper Pro SFT: 0. Of the Fenix Pro 2026: 2.

Often mentioned in video reviews

Hyper Pro SFT

No summarised videos yet.

Fenix Pro 20269 videos
  • Strong overheads 6×
  • Lots of power 4×
  • Good at the net 4×
  • Good control 3×
  • Good spin 3×
  • Good feel 2×
  • Demanding, needs good technique 6×
  • Small sweet spot 5×
  • Harder in defence 3×
  • Harder to handle 2×
Hyper Pro SFT: reviews and videos →Fenix Pro 2026: reviews and videos →

Or a third racket in between

OxdogUltimate Pro+ 2026

Close to both on paper, with more control than either.

€ 274.34Compare all three →

Was this page useful?