Rackets › Compare

Babolat Technical Viper Soft 3.0 vs Siux Fenix Pro 2026

Add a racket

The verdict

Choose the Technical Viper Soft 3.0 if you want more comfort, the Fenix Pro 2026 if you want more control.

Technical Viper Soft 3.0Highest score
Pick this one for
  • Comfort+1.5
Fenix Pro 2026
Pick this one for
  • Control+1.0

Better buy now: the Fenix Pro 2026. It plays better on paper (6.3 against 5.9) and costs only € 6.01 more in Netherlands.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Technical Viper Soft 3.0 to the Fenix Pro 2026: less comfort, more control.

Controlmore control2.53.5
Powerabout the same10.010.0
Comfortless comfort4.02.5
Handlingabout the same2.02.0
Forgivenessa bit more forgiveness2.53.0

Technical Viper Soft 3.0Fenix Pro 2026Line = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Weight
365 g
355 to 375 g
Balance
Head-heavy according to the brand, 270 mm
Head-heavy according to the brand
Face
Soft Carbon
Carbon 12k
Core
Black EVA
High-density EVA rubber
Surface
rough finishing
Rough
Show all specs (4 the same)
Launched
2026
2026
Shape
Diamond
Diamond
Thickness
38 mm
38 mm
Frame
Carbon
Carbon

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Technical Viper Soft 3.0: 2. Of the Fenix Pro 2026: 0.

Technical Viper Soft 3.0: reviews and videos →Fenix Pro 2026: reviews and videos →

Or a third racket in between

adidasMetalbone 3.3

Better where both are weak: comfort 6 against 4 and 2.5, and otherwise close to the two.

€ 182.40Compare all three →