Rackets › Compare

Siux Spyder Lite 3 Hard vs Joma Hyper Pro SFT

Add a racket

The verdict

Choose the Hyper Pro SFT if you want more handling. The Spyder Lite 3 Hard does nothing clearly better on paper.

Spyder Lite 3 HardHighest score
No clear edge

On paper it does nothing clearly better than the other.

Hyper Pro SFT
Pick this one for
  • Handling+1.0

Better buy now: the Spyder Lite 3 Hard. It plays at least as well on paper and costs € 16.10 less in Netherlands.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Spyder Lite 3 Hard to the Hyper Pro SFT: more handling.

Controlabout the same3.53.5
Powerabout the same10.010.0
Comforta bit more comfort2.53.0
Handlingmore handling2.03.0
Forgivenessabout the same3.03.0

Spyder Lite 3 HardHyper Pro SFTLine = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
2024
2026
Weight
355 to 375 g
350 to 360 g
Core
Hard EVA
Black EVA
Thickness
38 mm
Not published
Surface
Flat
Joma 3D Spin relief finish
Handle
Dual Pro Grip
Not published
Frame
3K tubular
Not published
Show all specs (3 the same)
Shape
Diamond
Diamond
Balance
Head-heavy according to the brand
Head-heavy according to the brand
Face
12K carbon
12K carbon

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Spyder Lite 3 Hard: 0. Of the Hyper Pro SFT: 0.

Spyder Lite 3 Hard: reviews and videos →Hyper Pro SFT: reviews and videos →

Or a third racket in between

adidasCross IT 3.4

Sits between the two on paper: more comfort than the Spyder Lite 3 Hard, more control than the Hyper Pro SFT.

€ 179.95Compare all three →

Was this page useful?