Rackets › Compare

LOK Maxx Hype Gen 2 Mike Yanguas vs Babolat Technical Viper 2025

Add a racket

The verdict

On paper they play much the same, so price and feel decide.

The Technical Viper 2025 plays better on paper (8.6 against 7.9), the Maxx Hype Gen 2 Mike Yanguas costs € 20.00 less in Netherlands. Pick the Maxx Hype Gen 2 Mike Yanguas if the price matters more than that difference.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Maxx Hype Gen 2 Mike Yanguas to the Technical Viper 2025 you gain and lose little: every trait stays within one point.

Controla bit more control4.04.5
Powera bit more power9.510.0
Comforta bit more comfort4.55.0
Handlingabout the same2.02.0
Forgivenessa bit more forgiveness3.54.0

Maxx Hype Gen 2 Mike YanguasTechnical Viper 2025Line = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
2026
2025
Weight
360 to 375 g
365 g
Face
C18 carbon
12K carbon
Core
Exclusive EVA rubber
X-EVA
Surface
3D Spin Lines
Rough
Handle
Not published
Syntec Pro
Frame
Asymmetric Heart
Carbon
Show all specs (3 the same)
Shape
Diamond
Diamond
Balance
Head-heavy according to the brand
Head-heavy according to the brand
Thickness
38 mm
38 mm

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Maxx Hype Gen 2 Mike Yanguas: 0. Of the Technical Viper 2025: 1.

Often mentioned in video reviews

Maxx Hype Gen 2 Mike Yanguas

No summarised videos yet.

Technical Viper 202510 videos
  • Lots of power 7×
  • Good feel 5×
  • Good spin 5×
  • Good control 4×
  • Comfortable, little vibration 2×
  • Strong overheads 2×
  • Large sweet spot 2×
  • Demanding, needs good technique 9×
  • Vibration, hard on the arm 3×
  • Small sweet spot 3×
  • Harder to handle 2×
Maxx Hype Gen 2 Mike Yanguas: reviews and videos →Technical Viper 2025: reviews and videos →

Or a third racket in between

NoxAT10 Genius 12K

Better where both are weak: control 7.5 against 4 and 4.5, and otherwise close to the two.

€ 179.95Compare all three →

Was this page useful?