Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Babolat Technical Viper 2025

The verdict

Choose the Technical Viper 3.0 if you want more handling, the Technical Viper 2025 if you want more comfort, forgiveness and control.

From the Technical Viper 2025 to the Technical Viper 3.0 5 specs changed: weight 365 g became 370 g (medium became heavy); balance head-heavy became head-heavy; face 12K carbon became 3K carbon (medium-stiff carbon became soft carbon); core X-EVA became Hard EVA (medium-hard core became hard core); surface rough became Rough finish.

Technical Viper 3.0
Pick this one for
  • Handling+2.0
Technical Viper 2025Highest score
Pick this one for
  • Comfort+2.5
  • Forgiveness+2.5
  • Control+1.0

Better buy now: the Technical Viper 2025. It plays at least as well on paper and costs € 36.37 less in Netherlands.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Technical Viper 3.0 to the Technical Viper 2025: more comfort, more forgiveness, less handling, more control.

Controlmore control3.54.5
Powerabout the same10.010.0
Comfortmore comfort2.55.0
Handlingless handling4.02.0
Forgivenessmore forgiveness1.54.0

Technical Viper 3.0Technical Viper 2025Line = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
2026
2025
Weight
370 g
365 g
Balance
Head-heavy according to the brand, 270 mm
Head-heavy according to the brand
Face
3K carbon
12K carbon
Core
Hard EVA
X-EVA
Surface
Rough finish
Rough
Handle
Not published
Syntec Pro
Show all specs (3 the same)
Shape
Diamond
Diamond
Thickness
38 mm
38 mm
Frame
Carbon
Carbon

Not published for one of the two, so not compared: balance point, handle and level.

Reviews and videos

Padelvergleich

Rates both about the same: 9.2 and 9.0.

Technical Viper 3.09.2Best for: Advanced tournament players seeking maximum offensive powerRead the review
Technical Viper 20259.0Best for: Advanced tournament players who prioritize aggressive attacking shotsRead the review

Often mentioned in video reviews

Said about both: lots of power, good feel, strong overheads, good spin, demanding, needs good technique, small sweet spot, vibration, hard on the arm, harder to handle.

Technical Viper 3.010 videos
  • Lots of power 10×
  • Good feel 6×
  • Strong overheads 3×
  • Good spin 3×
  • Good at the net 3×
  • Demanding, needs good technique 9×
  • Small sweet spot 4×
  • Vibration, hard on the arm 3×
  • Harder to handle 2×
  • Expensive 2×
Technical Viper 202510 videos
  • Lots of power 7×
  • Good feel 5×
  • Good spin 5×
  • Good control 4×
  • Comfortable, little vibration 2×
  • Strong overheads 2×
  • Large sweet spot 2×
  • Demanding, needs good technique 9×
  • Vibration, hard on the arm 3×
  • Small sweet spot 3×
  • Harder to handle 2×

Or a third racket in between

adidasMetalbone HRD+ 2026

Sits between the two on paper: more control than the Technical Viper 3.0, more handling than the Technical Viper 2025.

Was this page useful?