Stiga 18K X Hard Cybershape vs Stiga 18K 2 Cybershape

The verdict

Choose the 18K X Hard Cybershape if you want more comfort. The 18K 2 Cybershape does nothing clearly better on paper.

18K X Hard Cybershape
Pick this one for
  • Comfort+1.0
18K 2 Cybershape
No clear edge

On paper it does nothing clearly better than the other.

Better buy now: the 18K 2 Cybershape. It plays at least as well on paper and costs € 30.00 less in Netherlands.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the 18K X Hard Cybershape to the 18K 2 Cybershape: less comfort.

Controlabout the same7.07.0
Powera bit more power5.56.0
Comfortless comfort7.06.0
Handlingabout the same5.55.5
Forgivenessabout the same5.55.5

18K X Hard Cybershape18K 2 CybershapeLine = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Balance
Even according to the brand
Even according to the brand, 265 mm
Face
Carbon
18K Carbon Duplex
Core
Power Foam
Hypersoft Foam
Handle
Crystal Grip
Standard
Frame
360 Carbon
360 Carbon Frame
Show all specs (3 the same)
Shape
Hybrid
Hybrid
Weight
360 g
360 g
Surface
Rough
Rough

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the 18K X Hard Cybershape: 0. Of the 18K 2 Cybershape: 0.

Or a third racket in between

VarlionMAXIMA CUBE ELBOWCARE S

Sits between the two on paper: more control than the 18K X Hard Cybershape, more comfort than the 18K 2 Cybershape.

Was this page useful?