Rackets › Compare

StarVie Eternal by Sanyo Gutiérrez vs Stiga 18K 2 Cybershape

Add a racket

The verdict

Choose the 18K 2 Cybershape if you want more comfort. The Eternal by Sanyo Gutiérrez does nothing clearly better on paper.

Eternal by Sanyo Gutiérrez
No clear edge

On paper it does nothing clearly better than the other.

18K 2 CybershapeHighest score
Pick this one for
  • Comfort+1.5

Better buy now: the 18K 2 Cybershape. It plays at least as well on paper and costs € 25.00 less in Netherlands.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Eternal by Sanyo Gutiérrez to the 18K 2 Cybershape: more comfort.

Controlabout the same7.07.0
Powera bit less power6.56.0
Comfortmore comfort4.56.0
Handlingabout the same5.55.5
Forgivenessa bit more forgiveness5.05.5

Eternal by Sanyo Gutiérrez18K 2 CybershapeLine = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
2027
Not published
Weight
350 to 370 g
360 g
Balance
Even according to the brand
Even according to the brand, 265 mm
Face
18K Carbon Hybrid
18K Carbon Duplex
Core
M-EVA-Balance
Hypersoft Foam
Thickness
38 mm
Not published
Handle
Not published
Standard
Frame
Not published
360 Carbon Frame
Show all specs (2 the same)
Shape
Hybrid
Hybrid
Surface
Rough
Rough

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Eternal by Sanyo Gutiérrez: 0. Of the 18K 2 Cybershape: 0.

Eternal by Sanyo Gutiérrez: reviews and videos →18K 2 Cybershape: reviews and videos →

Or a third racket in between

StarVieRaptor+

Sits between the two on paper: more comfort than the Eternal by Sanyo Gutiérrez, more control than the 18K 2 Cybershape.

€ 209.95Compare all three →

Was this page useful?