Rackets › Compare

Stiga 3K 2 Cybershape vs Babolat Counter Veron 2025 2.5

Add a racket

The verdict

Choose the 3K 2 Cybershape if you want more comfort and handling, the Counter Veron 2025 2.5 if you want more power.

3K 2 CybershapeHighest score
Pick this one for
  • Comfort+2.0
  • Handling+1.0
Counter Veron 2025 2.5
Pick this one for
  • Power+1.0

Neither is sold to Netherlands by the shops on padell.io.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the 3K 2 Cybershape to the Counter Veron 2025 2.5: less comfort, more power, less handling.

Controlabout the same6.56.5
Powermore power5.06.0
Comfortless comfort8.06.0
Handlingless handling5.54.5
Forgivenessa bit less forgiveness5.55.0

3K 2 CybershapeCounter Veron 2025 2.5Line = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
Not published
2025
Weight
360 g
365 g
Balance
Slightly head-heavy according to the brand, 265 mm
Head-heavy according to the brand, 270 mm
Face
3K carbon
Carbon Flex
Core
Hypersoft Foam
X-EVA
Thickness
Not published
38 mm
Handle
Longer handle
Not published
Frame
360 Carbon Frame
Carbon
Show all specs (2 the same)
Shape
Hybrid
Hybrid
Surface
Rough
Rough

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the 3K 2 Cybershape: 0. Of the Counter Veron 2025 2.5: 0.

3K 2 Cybershape: reviews and videos →Counter Veron 2025 2.5: reviews and videos →

Or a third racket in between

HeadCyber 2026

Sits between the two on paper: more control than the 3K 2 Cybershape, more comfort than the Counter Veron 2025 2.5.

€ 79.97Compare all three →

Was this page useful?