Rackets › Compare

Bullpadel Xplo 02 27 vs Stiga 3K 2 Cybershape

Add a racket

The verdict

Choose the Xplo 02 27 if you want more power, the 3K 2 Cybershape if you want more comfort and handling.

Xplo 02 27
Pick this one for
  • Power+1.0
3K 2 CybershapeHighest score
Pick this one for
  • Comfort+2.0
  • Handling+1.0

Neither is sold to Netherlands by the shops on padell.io.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Xplo 02 27 to the 3K 2 Cybershape: more comfort, less power, more handling.

Controlabout the same6.56.5
Powerless power6.05.0
Comfortmore comfort6.08.0
Handlingmore handling4.55.5
Forgivenessa bit more forgiveness5.05.5

Xplo 02 273K 2 CybershapeLine = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
2027
Not published
Weight
365 to 375 g
360 g
Balance
Head-heavy according to the brand, 270 mm
Slightly head-heavy according to the brand, 265 mm
Face
X Tend Carbon 3K
3K carbon
Core
MultiEVA
Hypersoft Foam
Thickness
38 mm
Not published
Head size
507 cm²
Not published
Surface
3D
Rough
Handle
Hesacore
Longer handle
Frame
Carbon
360 Carbon Frame
Show all specs (1 the same)
Shape
Hybrid
Hybrid

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Xplo 02 27: 0. Of the 3K 2 Cybershape: 0.

Xplo 02 27: reviews and videos →3K 2 Cybershape: reviews and videos →

Or a third racket in between

HeadCyber 2026

Sits between the two on paper: more comfort than the Xplo 02 27, more control than the 3K 2 Cybershape.

€ 79.97Compare all three →

Was this page useful?