Rackets › Compare

adidas Match 2026 vs Stiga 3K 2 Cybershape

Add a racket

The verdict

Choose the Match 2026 if you want more power, the 3K 2 Cybershape if you want more handling and control.

Match 2026
Pick this one for
  • Power+1.5
3K 2 CybershapeHighest score
Pick this one for
  • Handling+3.0
  • Control+2.0

Neither is sold to Netherlands by the shops on padell.io.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Match 2026 to the 3K 2 Cybershape: more handling, more control, less power.

Controlmore control4.56.5
Powerless power6.55.0
Comforta bit more comfort7.58.0
Handlingmore handling2.55.5
Forgivenessabout the same5.55.5

Match 20263K 2 CybershapeLine = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
2026
Not published
Weight
360 to 375 g
360 g
Balance
Slightly head-heavy according to the brand
Slightly head-heavy according to the brand, 265 mm
Face
Fiberglass
3K carbon
Core
EVA Soft Performance
Hypersoft Foam
Thickness
38 mm
Not published
Head size
520 cm²
Not published
Surface
Smooth
Rough
Handle
Not published
Longer handle
Frame
Not published
360 Carbon Frame
Show all specs (1 the same)
Shape
Hybrid
Hybrid

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Match 2026: 0. Of the 3K 2 Cybershape: 0.

Match 2026: reviews and videos →3K 2 Cybershape: reviews and videos →

Or a third racket in between

OxdogPure Court 2026

Sits between the two on paper: more handling than the Match 2026, more forgiveness than the 3K 2 Cybershape.

€ 149.90Compare all three →

Was this page useful?