Babolat Technical Veron 2025

The Babolat Technical Veron 2025 was followed by the 3.0 in 2026. Four listed specs differ between them: the core, the surface, the weight and the balance label. No reviewer has published a verdict on the 2025 yet, so this page reads the sheet and says where it stops.

Veron 2025 or 3.0: what moved, what did not

Here is the 2025 against the 3.0 from 2026. The core went from X-EVA to Black EVA. The surface went from Rough to 3D Finish. The weight dropped from 365 g to 360 g. The balance label changed from High to Head Heavy.

The face is still Carbon Flex. The shape is still a diamond. The thickness is still 38 mm. So the racket keeps its character and changes some details.

Be careful with the word changed. These are listed labels. A different name for a core does not tell you how it plays differently. The 3.0 also publishes a balance of 270 mm. The 2025 sheet gives none, so you cannot compare the two numerically.

If you want the newer one, start with the Technical Veron 3.0. If you are looking at the 2025, the sections below explain what it asks of you.

Technical striker, says Babolat: the meters read Low control

The product page calls this a racket for the Technical Striker. It claims this player wants power, but also precision and control in every shot. That is a marketing pitch, not a measurement.

The specs tell a different story. Control is rated Low here. The diamond shape and high balance pull it down, and only the X-EVA core pulls it up. Power is rated High. So the racket is built for hitting through the ball, not for placing it softly.

Does that make the claim false? Not quite. An advanced player with clean technique can aim a diamond racket accurately. But the racket will not do it for you. Expect to bring the precision yourself.

X-EVA under Carbon Flex: where High power and Medium comfort come from

The face is called Carbon Flex. The product page says it combines carbon with fiberglass and describes it as a flexible surface. The retailer sheet lists a rough surface. The page claims the relief enhances spin. Treat that as the brand's description.

The core is X-EVA, a medium core in the padell.io rating. It is the main reason comfort reaches Medium and not lower. The face is rated as soft carbon, which also helps. Weight and balance pull comfort the other way.

The retailer also lists a vibration system called VIBRABSORB SYSTEM², described as absorbing vibration for comfortable play. That is a brand claim. No reviewer has tested it, so do not count on it to protect a sore arm.

365 g, adjustable, with a high balance: what the heavy diamond asks of your arm

The weight is listed at 365 g, both minimum and maximum. The weight system is listed as adjustable, at that same 365 g. What that means in practice is not explained. The product page says the adjustable weight favors maneuverability. The meters disagree: maneuverability is Low because of the diamond shape, the heavy weight and the high balance.

So what does that ask of you? A heavy racket with weight toward the head is harder to swing quickly. Volleys at the net need early preparation. Defence from the back of the court takes more effort. Smashes and bandejas are where the weight should pay off, because the head carries the shot.

The retailer lists the level as Advanced, which fits. If your shoulder or elbow already complains, this is not a gentle choice. A lighter, more even-balanced racket is easier on the arm. Not a heavier one with a softer face.

Veron 2025 next to the Technical Viper 2025 and the Bullpadel Vertex 04 Comfort

The Babolat Technical Viper 2025 shares the diamond shape, the high balance, the X-EVA core and the 365 g weight. Its face is 12K carbon, and its comfort meter is Low, one step under the Veron. If arm comfort matters, that is a reason to prefer the Veron of the two.

The Bullpadel Vertex 04 Comfort is also a high-balance diamond. It is listed for professionals and linked to Martin Di Nenno. Its weight ranges from 360 g to 370 g, and its meters match the Veron's. It is a step up in level, not in specs you can measure.

No balance in mm, head size or frame: what the 2025 sheet leaves out

Several things are not published for this racket. There is no balance in mm, no head size, no frame material and no handle detail. Balance is only given as the label High. Without a head size you cannot judge how big the sweet spot really is. The Low rating comes from the shape alone.

That is a real gap. Check these numbers with a shop before you buy, and do not assume the 3.0's published 270 mm balance applies to this racket.