adidas Metalbone HRD 3.2 vs Oxdog Ultimate Pro Light 2027

The verdict

Choose the Metalbone HRD 3.2 if you want more power, the Ultimate Pro Light 2027 if you want more comfort and handling.

Metalbone HRD 3.2Highest score
Pick this one for
  • Power+1.5
Ultimate Pro Light 2027
Pick this one for
  • Comfort+2.0
  • Handling+1.5

Neither is sold to Netherlands by the shops on padell.io.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Metalbone HRD 3.2 to the Ultimate Pro Light 2027: more comfort, less power, more handling.

Controla bit less control4.54.0
Powerless power10.08.5
Comfortmore comfort3.55.5
Handlingmore handling3.04.5
Forgivenessa bit more forgiveness3.03.5

Metalbone HRD 3.2Ultimate Pro Light 2027Line = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
2023
2027
Weight
345 to 360 g
350 g
Face
2-1 Aluminized Carbon
HES Carbon 8K
Core
EVA High Memory
Medium+
Thickness
38 mm
Not published
Head size
485 cm²
Not published
Surface
Not published
Sandy
Frame
Carbon
Not published
Show all specs (2 the same)
Shape
Diamond
Diamond
Balance
Head-heavy according to the brand
Head-heavy according to the brand

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Metalbone HRD 3.2: 1. Of the Ultimate Pro Light 2027: 0.

Often mentioned in video reviews

Metalbone HRD 3.24 videos
  • Adjustable weight system 3×
  • Lots of power 3×
  • Harder in defence 2×
  • Demanding, needs good technique 2×
Ultimate Pro Light 2027

No summarised videos yet.

Or a third racket in between

BabolatAir Viper 2.6

Better where both are weak: control 8 against 4.5 and 4, and otherwise close to the two.

Was this page useful?