adidas Metalbone HRD 3.2 vs StarVie Tritón Power +

The verdict

On paper they play much the same, so price and feel decide.

Neither is sold to Netherlands by the shops on padell.io.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Metalbone HRD 3.2 to the Tritón Power + you gain and lose little: every trait stays within one point.

Controla bit less control4.54.0
Powera bit less power10.09.5
Comforta bit more comfort3.54.0
Handlingabout the same3.03.0
Forgivenessa bit more forgiveness3.03.5

Metalbone HRD 3.2Tritón Power +Line = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
2023
2027
Weight
345 to 360 g
358 g
Face
2-1 Aluminized Carbon
18K Carbon Hybrid
Core
EVA High Memory
H-EVA Power
Head size
485 cm²
Not published
Surface
Not published
Rough
Handle
Not published
Longer Handgrip
Frame
Carbon
Not published
Show all specs (3 the same)
Shape
Diamond
Diamond
Balance
Head-heavy according to the brand
Head-heavy according to the brand
Thickness
38 mm
38 mm

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Metalbone HRD 3.2: 1. Of the Tritón Power +: 0.

Often mentioned in video reviews

Metalbone HRD 3.24 videos
  • Adjustable weight system 3×
  • Lots of power 3×
  • Harder in defence 2×
  • Demanding, needs good technique 2×
Tritón Power +

No summarised videos yet.

Or a third racket in between

JomaHyper Pro SFT

Sits between the two on paper: more power than the Tritón Power +.

Was this page useful?