Rackets › Compare

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Babolat Viper Juan Lebron 3.0 FW

Add a racket

The verdict

Choose the Technical Viper 3.0 if you want more handling, the Viper Juan Lebron 3.0 FW if you want more forgiveness and comfort.

Technical Viper 3.0Highest score
Pick this one for
  • Handling+2.0
Viper Juan Lebron 3.0 FW
Pick this one for
  • Forgiveness+1.5
  • Comfort+1.0

Neither is sold to Netherlands by the shops on padell.io.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Technical Viper 3.0 to the Viper Juan Lebron 3.0 FW: less handling, more forgiveness, more comfort.

Controla bit less control3.53.0
Powerabout the same10.010.0
Comfortmore comfort2.53.5
Handlingless handling4.02.0
Forgivenessmore forgiveness1.53.0

Technical Viper 3.0Viper Juan Lebron 3.0 FWLine = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Balance
Head-heavy according to the brand, 270 mm
Head-heavy according to the brand
Surface
Rough finish
Raised patterns
Handle
Not published
Syntec Pro
Show all specs (7 the same)
Launched
2026
2026
Shape
Diamond
Diamond
Weight
370 g
370 g
Face
3K carbon
3K carbon
Core
Hard EVA
Hard EVA
Thickness
38 mm
38 mm
Frame
Carbon
Carbon

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Technical Viper 3.0: 2. Of the Viper Juan Lebron 3.0 FW: 0.

Often mentioned in video reviews

Technical Viper 3.010 videos
  • Lots of power 10×
  • Good feel 6×
  • Strong overheads 3×
  • Good spin 3×
  • Good at the net 3×
  • Demanding, needs good technique 9×
  • Small sweet spot 4×
  • Vibration, hard on the arm 3×
  • Harder to handle 2×
  • Expensive 2×
Viper Juan Lebron 3.0 FW

No summarised videos yet.

Technical Viper 3.0: reviews and videos →Viper Juan Lebron 3.0 FW: reviews and videos →

Or a third racket in between

Drop ShotCanyon Pro Attack 2.0

Sits between the two on paper: more forgiveness than the Technical Viper 3.0, more handling than the Viper Juan Lebron 3.0 FW.

€ 159.95Compare all three →

Was this page useful?