Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Oxdog Ultimate Pro+ 2026

The verdict

Choose the Technical Viper 3.0 if you want more handling. The Ultimate Pro+ 2026 does nothing clearly better on paper.

Technical Viper 3.0
Pick this one for
  • Handling+2.0
Ultimate Pro+ 2026Highest score
No clear edge

On paper it does nothing clearly better than the other.

The Ultimate Pro+ 2026 plays better on paper (8.5 against 7.8), the Technical Viper 3.0 costs € 58.02 less in Netherlands. Pick the Technical Viper 3.0 if the price matters more than that difference.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Technical Viper 3.0 to the Ultimate Pro+ 2026: less handling.

Controla bit more control3.54.0
Powerabout the same10.010.0
Comforta bit less comfort2.52.0
Handlingless handling4.02.0
Forgivenessa bit more forgiveness1.52.0

Technical Viper 3.0Ultimate Pro+ 2026Line = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Balance
Head-heavy according to the brand, 270 mm
Head-heavy according to the brand
Face
3K carbon
HES Carbon
Core
Hard EVA
Hard
Thickness
38 mm
Not published
Surface
Rough finish
Sandy
Frame
Carbon
Not published
Show all specs (3 the same)
Launched
2026
2026
Shape
Diamond
Diamond
Weight
370 g
370 g

Reviews and videos

padel.how

Rates both about the same: 7.4 and 7.6.

Technical Viper 3.07.4Best for: Advanced attack-first players who center ball consistently and want maximum powerRead the review
Ultimate Pro+ 20267.6Best for: Advanced attacking players with clean upper-zone contact and good racket-head speedRead the review

Often mentioned in video reviews

Said about both: lots of power, demanding, needs good technique, small sweet spot.

Technical Viper 3.010 videos
  • Lots of power 10×
  • Good feel 6×
  • Strong overheads 3×
  • Good spin 3×
  • Good at the net 3×
  • Demanding, needs good technique 9×
  • Small sweet spot 4×
  • Vibration, hard on the arm 3×
  • Harder to handle 2×
  • Expensive 2×
Ultimate Pro+ 20265 videos
  • Lots of power 3×
  • Comfortable, little vibration 2×
  • Good control 2×
  • Easy to handle 2×
  • Demanding, needs good technique 3×
  • Little spin 2×
  • Small sweet spot 2×

Or a third racket in between

adidasMetalbone HRD+ 2026

Sits between the two on paper: more control than the Technical Viper 3.0, more comfort than the Ultimate Pro+ 2026.

Was this page useful?