Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Oxdog Ultimate Pro+ 2026
The verdict
Choose the Technical Viper 3.0 if you want more handling. The Ultimate Pro+ 2026 does nothing clearly better on paper.
- Handling+2.0
On paper it does nothing clearly better than the other.
The Ultimate Pro+ 2026 plays better on paper (8.5 against 7.8), the Technical Viper 3.0 costs € 58.02 less in Netherlands. Pick the Technical Viper 3.0 if the price matters more than that difference.
Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →
How they play
From the Technical Viper 3.0 to the Ultimate Pro+ 2026: less handling.
From the Ultimate Pro+ 2026 to the Technical Viper 3.0: more handling.
Technical Viper 3.0Ultimate Pro+ 2026Line = the average of all rackets
Where the specs differ
Show all specs (3 the same)
Reviews and videos
Rates both about the same: 7.4 and 7.6.
Often mentioned in video reviews
Said about both: lots of power, demanding, needs good technique, small sweet spot.
- Lots of power 10×
- Good feel 6×
- Strong overheads 3×
- Good spin 3×
- Good at the net 3×
- Demanding, needs good technique 9×
- Small sweet spot 4×
- Vibration, hard on the arm 3×
- Harder to handle 2×
- Expensive 2×
- Lots of power 3×
- Comfortable, little vibration 2×
- Good control 2×
- Easy to handle 2×
- Demanding, needs good technique 3×
- Little spin 2×
- Small sweet spot 2×
Or a third racket in between
Sits between the two on paper: more control than the Technical Viper 3.0, more comfort than the Ultimate Pro+ 2026.
Was this page useful?












