Rackets › Compare

Dunlop FX Hybrid vs Dunlop Galactica Pro By Nisse 2026

Add a racket

The verdict

Choose the FX Hybrid if you want more comfort. The Galactica Pro By Nisse 2026 does nothing clearly better on paper.

FX Hybrid
Pick this one for
  • Comfort+1.0
Galactica Pro By Nisse 2026Highest score
No clear edge

On paper it does nothing clearly better than the other.

The Galactica Pro By Nisse 2026 plays better on paper (7.2 against 6.6), the FX Hybrid costs € 19.05 less in Netherlands. Pick the FX Hybrid if the price matters more than that difference.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the FX Hybrid to the Galactica Pro By Nisse 2026: less comfort.

Controlabout the same5.55.5
Powera bit more power8.08.5
Comfortless comfort4.53.5
Handlingabout the same2.52.5
Forgivenessabout the same5.05.0

FX HybridGalactica Pro By Nisse 2026Line = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
Not published
2026
Weight
365 g
360 to 375 g
Face
Carbon 12k
Carbon 16k
Core
Eva Pro
Pro EVA
Surface
3d, Rough
3D Rough
Show all specs (2 the same)
Shape
Hybrid
Hybrid
Balance
Head-heavy according to the brand
Head-heavy according to the brand

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the FX Hybrid: 0. Of the Galactica Pro By Nisse 2026: 0.

FX Hybrid: reviews and videos →Galactica Pro By Nisse 2026: reviews and videos →

Or a third racket in between

adidasMetalbone Carbon 2026

Better where both are weak: comfort 7 against 4.5 and 3.5, and otherwise close to the two.

€ 167.95Compare all three →