Rackets › Compare

Dunlop FX Start vs Dunlop Nanomax Lite

Add a racket

The verdict

Choose the Nanomax Lite if you want more comfort. The FX Start does nothing clearly better on paper.

FX Start
No clear edge

On paper it does nothing clearly better than the other.

Nanomax Lite
Pick this one for
  • Comfort+1.5

Better buy now: the FX Start. It plays at least as well on paper and costs € 11.04 less in Netherlands.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the FX Start to the Nanomax Lite: more comfort.

Controlabout the same7.07.0
Powera bit less power6.05.5
Comfortmore comfort5.57.0
Handlingabout the same5.55.5
Forgivenessa bit more forgiveness5.05.5

FX StartNanomax LiteLine = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
2026
Not published
Weight
360 g
355 g
Balance
Even according to the brand
Even according to the brand, 260 mm
Core
Eva Pro
Soft Eva
Thickness
38 mm
Not published
Frame
Graphite
Not published
Show all specs (3 the same)
Shape
Hybrid
Hybrid
Face
Glaphite
Glaphite
Surface
Flat
Flat

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the FX Start: 0. Of the Nanomax Lite: 0.

FX Start: reviews and videos →Nanomax Lite: reviews and videos →

Or a third racket in between

BullpadelNeuron 25

Sits between the two on paper: more comfort than the FX Start, more control than the Nanomax Lite.

€ 197.95Compare all three →