Stiga 18K LW 2 Cybershape vs Dunlop Nanomax Lite

The verdict

Choose the 18K LW 2 Cybershape if you want more handling. The Nanomax Lite does nothing clearly better on paper.

18K LW 2 CybershapeHighest score
Pick this one for
  • Handling+1.5
Nanomax Lite
No clear edge

On paper it does nothing clearly better than the other.

Neither is sold to Netherlands by the shops on padell.io.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the 18K LW 2 Cybershape to the Nanomax Lite: less handling.

Controlabout the same7.07.0
Powerabout the same5.55.5
Comforta bit more comfort6.57.0
Handlingless handling7.05.5
Forgivenessabout the same5.55.5

18K LW 2 CybershapeNanomax LiteLine = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Weight
345 g
355 g
Balance
Even according to the brand, 265 mm
Even according to the brand, 260 mm
Face
18K Carbon Duplex
Glaphite
Core
Hypersoft Foam
Soft EVA
Thickness
Not published
38 mm
Surface
Crystal Grip
Flat
Handle
Longer handle
Not published
Frame
360 Carbon Frame
Carbon
Show all specs (1 the same)
Shape
Hybrid
Hybrid

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the 18K LW 2 Cybershape: 0. Of the Nanomax Lite: 0.

Or a third racket in between

VarlionMAXIMA CUBE ELBOWCARE S

Close to both on paper, with more control than either.

Was this page useful?