Rackets › Compare

Dunlop Titan Killer 2.0 vs Stiga 3K 2 Cybershape

Add a racket

The verdict

Choose the 3K 2 Cybershape if you want more comfort and handling. The Titan Killer 2.0 does nothing clearly better on paper.

Titan Killer 2.0
No clear edge

On paper it does nothing clearly better than the other.

3K 2 CybershapeHighest score
Pick this one for
  • Comfort+1.5
  • Handling+1.0

The 3K 2 Cybershape plays better on paper (6.9 against 6.3), the Titan Killer 2.0 costs € 183.05 less in Netherlands. Pick the Titan Killer 2.0 if the price matters more than that difference.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Titan Killer 2.0 to the 3K 2 Cybershape: more comfort, more handling.

Controla bit more control4.55.0
Powera bit less power7.06.5
Comfortmore comfort6.07.5
Handlingmore handling2.53.5
Forgivenessa bit more forgiveness5.05.5

Titan Killer 2.03K 2 CybershapeLine = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
2024
Not published
Shape
Hybrid
Cybershape
Weight
360 to 375 g
360 g
Balance
Head-heavy according to the brand
Slightly head-heavy according to the brand, 265 mm
Face
Fiberglass
3K Carbon
Core
Mega Flex Core
Hypersoft Foam
Thickness
38 mm
Not published
Surface
Flat
Rough
Handle
Not published
Longer handle
Frame
Corrugated frame
360 Carbon Frame

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Titan Killer 2.0: 0. Of the 3K 2 Cybershape: 0.

Titan Killer 2.0: reviews and videos →3K 2 Cybershape: reviews and videos →

Or a third racket in between

HeadSpeed One 2025

Better where both are weak: handling 5 against 2.5 and 3.5, and otherwise close to the two.

€ 159.95Compare all three →