Rackets › Compare

Oxdog Pure Pro+ 2026 vs Stiga 18K Hard 2 Cybershape

Add a racket

The verdict

Choose the Pure Pro+ 2026 if you want more power, the 18K Hard 2 Cybershape if you want more handling and control.

Pure Pro+ 2026Highest score
Pick this one for
  • Power+1.5
18K Hard 2 Cybershape
Pick this one for
  • Handling+3.0
  • Control+1.0

Better buy now: the Pure Pro+ 2026. It plays at least as well on paper and costs € 34.63 less in Netherlands.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Pure Pro+ 2026 to the 18K Hard 2 Cybershape: more handling, less power, more control.

Controlmore control5.56.5
Powerless power9.07.5
Comforta bit more comfort2.02.5
Handlingmore handling2.55.5
Forgivenessa bit less forgiveness5.04.5

Pure Pro+ 202618K Hard 2 CybershapeLine = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
2026
Not published
Weight
370 g
360 g
Balance
Head-heavy according to the brand
Head-heavy according to the brand, 270 mm
Face
HES Carbon
18K Carbon Duplex
Core
Hard
Performance Foam
Thickness
38 mm
Not published
Surface
Sandy
Rough
Handle
Not published
Longer handle
Frame
Not published
360 Carbon Frame
Show all specs (1 the same)
Shape
Hybrid
Hybrid

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Pure Pro+ 2026: 1. Of the 18K Hard 2 Cybershape: 0.

Often mentioned in video reviews

Pure Pro+ 20264 videos
  • Good control 3×
  • Solid build 2×
  • Lots of power 2×
  • Large sweet spot 2×
  • Harder to handle 3×
18K Hard 2 Cybershape

No summarised videos yet.

Pure Pro+ 2026: reviews and videos →18K Hard 2 Cybershape: reviews and videos →

Or a third racket in between

HeadExtreme Pro 2026

Better where both are weak: comfort 6.5 against 2 and 2.5, and otherwise close to the two.

€ 239.95Compare all three →

Was this page useful?