Stiga 18K Hard 2 Cybershape vs Vibor-A Yarara Atrox

The verdict

Choose the 18K Hard 2 Cybershape if you want more handling and control, the Yarara Atrox if you want more power.

18K Hard 2 Cybershape
Pick this one for
  • Handling+2.0
  • Control+1.5
Yarara AtroxHighest score
Pick this one for
  • Power+1.5

Better buy now: the Yarara Atrox. It plays at least as well on paper and costs € 40.00 less in Netherlands.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the 18K Hard 2 Cybershape to the Yarara Atrox: less handling, less control, more power.

Controlless control6.55.0
Powermore power7.59.0
Comforta bit less comfort2.52.0
Handlingless handling5.53.5
Forgivenessabout the same4.54.5

18K Hard 2 CybershapeYarara AtroxLine = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Weight
360 g
Not published
Balance
Head-heavy according to the brand, 270 mm
Slightly head-heavy according to the brand
Face
18K Carbon Duplex
12K aluminized carbon
Core
Performance Foam
EVA Pro Hard
Thickness
Not published
38 mm
Surface
Rough
Glossy 3D
Handle
Longer handle
Not published
Frame
360 Carbon Frame
Carbon
Show all specs (1 the same)
Shape
Hybrid
Hybrid

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the 18K Hard 2 Cybershape: 0. Of the Yarara Atrox: 0.

Or a third racket in between

Drop ShotAxion Attack Soft

Better where both are weak: comfort 5.5 against 2.5 and 2, and otherwise close to the two.

Was this page useful?