Stiga 18K X Hard Cybershape Adam Axelsson Edition vs Stiga 18K Hard 2 Cybershape

The verdict

On paper they play much the same, so price and feel decide.

Neither is sold to Netherlands by the shops on padell.io.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the 18K X Hard Cybershape Adam Axelsson Edition to the 18K Hard 2 Cybershape you gain and lose little: every trait stays within one point.

Controlabout the same6.56.5
Powerabout the same7.57.5
Comfortabout the same2.52.5
Handlingabout the same5.55.5
Forgivenessabout the same4.54.5

18K X Hard Cybershape Adam Axelsson Edition18K Hard 2 CybershapeLine = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Balance
Even according to the brand
Head-heavy according to the brand, 270 mm
Face
18K X Hard Carbon Duplex
18K Carbon Duplex
Surface
Not published
Rough
Handle
Not published
Longer handle
Frame
Not published
360 Carbon Frame
Show all specs (3 the same)
Shape
Hybrid
Hybrid
Weight
360 g
360 g
Core
Performance Foam
Performance Foam

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the 18K X Hard Cybershape Adam Axelsson Edition: 0. Of the 18K Hard 2 Cybershape: 0.

Or a third racket in between

BabolatAir Veron 2.6

Better where both are weak: comfort 5 against 2.5 and 2.5, and otherwise close to the two.

Was this page useful?