Stiga 18K Hard 2 Cybershape vs Stiga Cybershape 18K Hard Adam Axelsson Edition

The verdict

Choose the 18K Hard 2 Cybershape if you want more handling and control, the Cybershape 18K Hard Adam Axelsson Edition if you want more power.

18K Hard 2 Cybershape
Pick this one for
  • Handling+2.0
  • Control+1.5
Cybershape 18K Hard Adam Axelsson EditionHighest score
Pick this one for
  • Power+1.5

Neither is sold to Netherlands by the shops on padell.io.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the 18K Hard 2 Cybershape to the Cybershape 18K Hard Adam Axelsson Edition: less handling, less control, more power.

Controlless control6.55.0
Powermore power7.59.0
Comforta bit less comfort2.52.0
Handlingless handling5.53.5
Forgivenessabout the same4.54.5

18K Hard 2 CybershapeCybershape 18K Hard Adam Axelsson EditionLine = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Balance
Head-heavy according to the brand, 270 mm
Head-heavy according to the brand
Surface
Rough
Sandy
Handle
Longer handle
Longer handle for more flexible play
Frame
360 Carbon Frame
360 Carbon Frame in 100% carbon
Show all specs (4 the same)
Shape
Hybrid
Hybrid
Weight
360 g
360 g
Face
18K Carbon Duplex
18K Carbon Duplex
Core
Performance Foam
Performance Foam

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the 18K Hard 2 Cybershape: 0. Of the Cybershape 18K Hard Adam Axelsson Edition: 0.

Or a third racket in between

Drop ShotAxion Attack Soft

Better where both are weak: comfort 5.5 against 2.5 and 2, and otherwise close to the two.

Was this page useful?