Rackets › Compare

Siux Spyder Lite 3 Hard vs Oxdog Ultimate Pro+ 2026

Add a racket

The verdict

Choose the Spyder Lite 3 Hard if you want more forgiveness. The Ultimate Pro+ 2026 does nothing clearly better on paper.

Spyder Lite 3 Hard
Pick this one for
  • Forgiveness+1.0
Ultimate Pro+ 2026Highest score
No clear edge

On paper it does nothing clearly better than the other.

Better buy now: the Spyder Lite 3 Hard. It plays at least as well on paper and costs € 129.44 less in Netherlands.

Still in doubt? The racket finder checks both against your level, side and arm. Open the racket finder →

How they play

From the Spyder Lite 3 Hard to the Ultimate Pro+ 2026: less forgiveness.

Controla bit more control3.54.0
Powerabout the same10.010.0
Comforta bit less comfort2.52.0
Handlingabout the same2.02.0
Forgivenessless forgiveness3.02.0

Spyder Lite 3 HardUltimate Pro+ 2026Line = the average of all rackets

Where the specs differ

Launched
2024
2026
Weight
355 to 375 g
370 g
Face
12K carbon
HES Carbon
Core
Hard EVA
Hard
Thickness
38 mm
Not published
Surface
Flat
Sandy
Handle
Dual Pro Grip
Not published
Frame
3K tubular
Not published
Show all specs (2 the same)
Shape
Diamond
Diamond
Balance
Head-heavy according to the brand
Head-heavy according to the brand

Reviews and videos

No review site has tested both yet. Reviews of the Spyder Lite 3 Hard: 0. Of the Ultimate Pro+ 2026: 1.

Often mentioned in video reviews

Spyder Lite 3 Hard

No summarised videos yet.

Ultimate Pro+ 20265 videos
  • Lots of power 3×
  • Comfortable, little vibration 2×
  • Good control 2×
  • Easy to handle 2×
  • Demanding, needs good technique 3×
  • Little spin 2×
  • Small sweet spot 2×
Spyder Lite 3 Hard: reviews and videos →Ultimate Pro+ 2026: reviews and videos →

Or a third racket in between

NoxVentus Attack 12K XTREM

Sits between the two on paper: more forgiveness than the Ultimate Pro+ 2026.

€ 344.16Compare all three →

Was this page useful?