Rackets · Siux · Black Carbon Revolution Red
Siux Black Carbon Revolution 2 Red
2023

Siux Black Carbon Revolution 2 Red

7.7padell.io scoreSpecs only
Shape
Round
Weight
355 to 375 g
Balance
Head-light
Core
EVA Hard rubber
Does it suit your game?Seven quick questions, with this racket as the starting point.
Question 1 of 7

What is your level?

The short answer

A control racket: easy to place the ball. Made for advanced players.

Worked out from the published specs. No editorial review yet.

Strong at

  • Easy to place the ball

Less strong at

  • Less punch on smashes
  • Firm, can be tough on the arm

How it plays

7.7
padell.io score 7.7Play 8.4 (60%) and reviews 6.6 (40%). No independent reviews found yet, so that part starts low. How the score works
Control8.5above average▲
Power4.5below average▼
Comfort4.5below average▼
Handling6.5above average▲
Forgiveness6.5above average▲

Line = the average of all rackets ▲ above ▼ below

A control racket: easy to place the ball.

Specifications

Launched2023
Weight355 to 375 gAverage: not tiring, stable enough
BalanceHead-light according to the brandHead-light: quick hands at the net
Face6K carbonSoft carbon: more feel and easier ball exit
CoreEVA Hard rubberHard: control and power at speed, more vibration
SurfaceFlat
HandleDual Pro Grip
Frame100% carbon

Not published by the brand: thickness, head size

Specs from padelnuestro.com · checked 23 September 2026 · Spotted a wrong spec? Report it →

The price is followed as soon as a shop in your market sells it.

Similar rackets

All rackets that play like the Siux Black Carbon Revolution 2 Red →

Questions before you buy

What is the closest alternative?

The Nox ML10 Pro Cup Luxury Series 23 plays most alike. On paper the differences are under one point.

Compare side by side →
Who should not buy it?

Skip it if you want easy power for smashes (power 4.5/10), or if your elbow or shoulder complains (comfort 4.5/10).

How heavy is it really?

The brand gives 355 to 375 g. That counts as medium. Each racket can differ within that range.

Why a range? →