Siux Electra Elite 2026

Put the Electra Elite 2026 beside the Electra Elite 6 and most of the sheet matches. Shape, 38 mm thickness, Advanced level and medium balance are the same. The face is not.

No reviews exist for this racket yet. Everything below comes from the listed specs, so read it as what the specs suggest, not as court-tested fact.

3K or 12K: the one face that separates two Electra Elites

This racket lists a 3K carbon face. The Elite 6 lists 12K carbon. That is the clearest difference between the two, and it is the one to think about first.

The weight window also starts a little lower on the Elite 6: 355 to 375 g, against 360 to 375 g here. The gap at the bottom end is small.

The cores carry different labels too: EVA Mid Touch Core here, EVA rubber on the Elite 6. Those labels come from shops, so treat them as labels, not as a measured difference.

Medium on four meters, Low on handling

Control, power, comfort and sweet spot all read Medium. Maneuverability reads Low. The reason is weight. At 360 to 375 g the racket is heavy. The medium balance raises handling a little, but the result is still Low.

What do you notice on paper? Nothing extreme. No single strength to build your game around, and no obvious hole except handling. Not a specialist, but a racket for a player who wants a steady, even tool.

Mid Touch Core under 3K carbon: what to expect in your arm

The core is listed as medium and the 3K face is listed as the softer type of carbon. Both raise the comfort meter. The weight pulls it back down, which is why comfort ends at Medium.

So do not read this as a soft racket. Read it as a medium one where two features help and one works against it. If comfort is your first question, the weight is the number to look at.

A rough face and a 38 mm profile

The surface is listed as rough, sandy. A rough surface is generally linked to more spin, and the product page makes that same claim. Treat it as a brand claim until a reviewer tests it.

The 38 mm profile is shared with the Pegasus Elite 2026 and the Wilson Blade V4 Padel, so thickness will not separate these rackets for you. Weight, core and face will.

Electra Pro 2026, Pegasus Elite 2026 and Wilson Blade V4

The Electra Pro 2026 is the same-year sibling. It is labelled Professional, uses a 12K carbon face and lists 355 to 375 g. Its meters read High for control and Low for comfort. So you trade comfort for control. If you have the level and want that step, look there. If not, this racket is the calmer choice.

The Siux Pegasus Elite 2026 matches almost line for line: teardrop, 38 mm, 3K carbon, Advanced, 360 to 375 g. Only the core differs, listed as EVA Pro. Its five meters are the same as this racket. A direct comparison shows the two side by side.

The Wilson Blade V4 Padel is also a 38 mm teardrop, at 365 g flat, with a firm EVA core and a carbon and fiberglass face. Its comfort and sweet spot meters read Low, against Medium here. On paper the Siux has the higher comfort and sweet spot meters. Handling reads Low on both.

What Siux says about all-round play, and what the specs can back up

The product page says the racket adapts to all match situations and balances control and power with a comfortable touch. The specs partly agree: four meters at Medium fits a balanced profile.

But the page also mentions manoeuvrability, which is a brand claim, and the meter here reads Low. That is the claim to treat with care. The page also describes the Mid Touch Core as delivering a balanced touch. That fits the medium comfort meter, though nobody has measured it on court yet.

Until reviews arrive, the safest reading is simple. It is an Advanced-level teardrop with an even profile, a heavy build and a 3K carbon face.