Siux Trilogy Elite 5

Same shape, same Low balance label, same weight range: on the surface the Siux Trilogy Elite 6 looks like a straight copy of this racket. Yet four listed materials changed underneath. This page covers the Elite 5 from 2025. It rests on specs only, because no review of it has been found and it has not been played for this page.

Four materials changed between the Elite 5 and the Elite 6

The Elite 6 keeps the Low balance label, the Advanced level, the round shape and the 355 to 375 g weight range. What moves is the build. The core goes from Soft EVA to plain EVA. The face goes from 12K carbon to 3K carbon. The frame goes from 3K carbon and aramid to carbon. The surface goes from rough to sandy.

That is a changed listing, and nothing more. No source says how the racket plays differently. Treat the Elite 5 as its own build, not as the same racket with a new colour. If you want the side-by-side, use the Elite 6 comparison.

12K face and a 3K and aramid frame: what the older build lists

Shops list a 12K carbon face and a frame of 3K carbon and aramid. The product page claims the 12K surface gives more rigidity and firmness. Take that as the brand's wording, not a measurement. The listing also names Dual Pro Grip as anti-vibration, and a core density of Medium.

The Elite 6 drops to a 3K face and a plain carbon frame. Whether you would notice on court is unknown. What you can say is that the Elite 5 is the one with the extra material in the list.

Handling and weight: what the build asks of your arm

The product page promises great ease in handling. The maneuverability meter reads Medium. The round shape and low balance push it up. The weight pulls it down. Expect a racket that is easy to place, not whippy.

Shops list the weight as a range, 355 to 375 g. The comfort meter is Medium for a reason: the soft core helps, the weight works against it. A low balance keeps the mass nearer your hand, so it should seem lighter than the number suggests. That is the specs talking, not a court test. If your arm is sensitive, check the exact weight of your unit before you commit.

Soft EVA in a round head: why control and sweet spot read High and power Low

The soft core adds control, comfort and a forgiving hitting area. The round shape adds control and sweet spot, and takes away power. The Low balance label also keeps power down. The 12K face pulls power up a little, but not enough to change the picture. The result is High control, High sweet spot and Low power.

The product page says the racket keeps control without losing power. The meters do not back the second half. Power reads Low. If you want to hit through the court, look elsewhere.

Elite 5 next to the Head Gravity Pro 2024 and the Drop Shot Axion Control 1.0

The Head Gravity Pro 2024 is also round, Low balance and Advanced. It is listed at 365 g and 38 mm thick, with 265 mm balance. Its comfort reads High against Medium here, and its maneuverability reads Low against Medium. So it is the calmer choice on paper, while the Elite 5 turns more easily.

The Drop Shot Axion Control 1.0 has the same five meters as this racket: High control, Low power, Medium comfort, Medium maneuverability, High sweet spot. It is listed as Intermediate / Advanced, at 360 to 370 g. It is the closest like-for-like if you want a second opinion.

Thickness, head size, handle: what the listings leave out

Thickness, head size, balance in mm, handle and weight system are not published for this racket. The Elite 6 and the Elite 2026 listings both show 38 mm thickness. That is not proof for the Elite 5. The Elite 2026 listing also shows a 360 g minimum and no balance label. So it looks like a separate listing, not a proven twin. See the Elite 2026 page before you assume it is the same racket as the Elite 6.